Methodology · Manifesto

How we test

This page explains how GEARCHAMBER reviews and articles are put together.

Our reviews and articles are built from published specifications, official announcements and other outlets’ reporting, then reviewed by an editor before they go live.

How a review is built

Quoted from this page
  1. Gather

    published specifications, official announcements and other outlets’ reporting

  2. Weigh

    specifications, price, and performance data and impressions from published sources

    From: Hardware and games
  3. Write

    written up with pros, cons and a one-line verdict

    From: Scores
  4. Edit

    reviewed by an editor before they go live

  5. Score

    scored out of 100

    From: Scores

Scores

Ticks: 35 published review scores, live

Reviews are scored out of 100.

The colour band is a quick read: green is a strong recommendation, amber is good with caveats, and red means most people should look elsewhere.

  • Red0–59 most people should look elsewhere
  • Amber60–79 good with caveats
  • Green80–100 a strong recommendation

Principles

  1. Every review lists its pros, cons and a one-line verdict.

    Scores
  2. We weigh specifications, price, and performance data and impressions from published sources.

    Hardware and games
  3. We never present someone else’s results as our own.

    News and analysis

Sourcing

Name the source.

Where a review relies on someone else’s testing, we aim to say so and name the source.

Hardware and games

When we report on testing done by others, we name who did it and on what setup.

News and analysis