Back to Hardware Reviews
Graphics Card
55 · TechSpot

RTX 5050 review roundup: RX 7600 speed at RX 7600 money, and labs say stretch for something else

TechSpot’s 60 and Tom’s Hardware’s 2.5 stars agree: $250 buys too little when $50 more buys about 40% more card.

On
2 min read
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5050 Windforce OC 8G graphics card and box

Pros

  • Much faster than RTX 3050, about RTX 4060 level (Tom's Hardware)
  • Low power draw, cool and quiet partner cards

Cons

  • 3% slower than the RX 7600 across 18 games (TechSpot)
  • 8GB RX 9060 XT is ~40% faster for 20% more
  • 8GB limits Multi-Frame Generation (Tom's Hardware)

RTX 5050 versus RX 7600

TechSpot’s 18-game 1080p average for the GeForce RTX 5050 came in at 66 fps, 3% slower than AMD’s RX 7600. “You’re getting RX 7600 performance for RX 7600 pricing,” TechSpot concludes. This is a roundup of published lab reviews, not a GearChamber test. The consensus score of 55 is the mean of TechSpot’s 60/100 and Tom’s Hardware’s 2.5 out of 5, read as 50.

Lab scores

OutletScore / verdictKey number
TechSpot60/100, “a disappointing product at $250”18-game 1080p average: 66 fps
Tom’s Hardware2.5/5, “overpriced for the performance”“Should be $229” given RTX 5060 results

What $250 buys

TechSpot says the RTX 5050 uses the GB207 die with 33% fewer cores than the RTX 5060, and swaps GDDR7 for GDDR6, cutting bandwidth by 29% to 320 GB/s. Nvidia sent no review samples at all, so TechSpot bought one after launch. Tom’s Hardware credits it with being “much faster than RTX 3050 at 1080p” and generally matching an RTX 4060.

Graphic of TechSpot RTX 5050 averages against rivals
TechSpot’s 18-game average put the RTX 5050 at RX 7600 level, while an 8GB RX 9060 XT costing 20% more was about 40% faster. Graphic: GEARCHAMBER, from TechSpot data.

The rivals are what sink it. In TechSpot’s results, the 8GB RX 9060 XT was 54% faster in Cyberpunk 2077 and 100% faster in Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. Across its suite, the RX 9060 XT “costs 20% more but is ~40% faster,” and the RTX 5060 is 20% more expensive for “just over 30% better performance.” At 1440p, the RTX 5050 costs 30% more per frame than the 16GB RX 9060 XT.

Tom’s Hardware adds a feature caveat: “8GB of VRAM means you can’t always enjoy signature Blackwell features like Multi-Frame Generation when you need them most.” Its other complaints are 8GB problems “in some games, even at 1080p” and relatively low power efficiency for a Blackwell card. TechSpot measured roughly RTX 4060 power draw, about 60W less than the 9060 XT, and a peak of 73°C on an MSI Shadow card, with its fans at 1,900 RPM and 38 dBA.

Who should buy, and who should wait

  • Stretch to an 8GB RX 9060 XT or an RTX 5060. TechSpot “strongly” recommends spending the extra $50.
  • Save for the 16GB RX 9060 XT if you play at 1440p. TechSpot calls it “the clear value leader among budget GPUs.”
  • Consider the used market if $250 is a hard limit. That’s TechSpot’s own fallback advice.
  • Buy the RTX 5050 only if you need a cool, quiet, low-power 1080p card and it’s well under list price. Tom’s Hardware says it should be $229.

Gigabyte’s product page lists the Windforce OC 8G’s specs, but no lab here argues for paying its $250 list price.

0 comments

Join the conversation

Anyone can read comments. Sign in or create a free account to post and reply.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.